How Teacher Characteristics Relate to How Teachers Use Dashboards

Results From Two Case Studies in K-12




teacher dashboards, teacher characteristics, K-12


Teacher dashboards are a specific form of analytics in which visual displays provide teachers with information about their students; for example, concerning student progress and performance on tasks during lessons or lectures. In the present paper, we focus on the role of teacher dashboards in the context of teacher decision-making in K–12 education. There is large variation in teacher dashboard use in the classroom, which could be explained by teacher characteristics. Therefore, we investigate the role of teacher characteristics — such as experience, age, gender, and self-efficacy — in how teachers use dashboards. More specifically, we present two case studies to understand how diversity in teacher dashboard use is related to teacher characteristics. Surprisingly, in both case studies, teacher characteristics were not associated with dashboard use. Based on our findings, we propose an initial framework to understand what contributes to diversity of dashboard use. This framework might support future research to attribute diversity in dashboard use. This paper should be seen as a first step in examining the role of teacher characteristics in dashboard use in K–12 education.


Admiraal, W., Louws, M., Lockhorst, D., Paas, T., Buynsters, M., Cviko, A., … & Kester, L. (2017). Teachers in school-based technology innovations: A typology of their beliefs on teaching and technology. Computers and Education, 114, 57–68.

Aleven, V., McLaughlin, E. A., Glenn, R. A., & Koedinger, K. R. (2016). Instruction based on adaptive learning technologies. In R. E. Mayer & P. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction. Abingdon-on-Thames, UK: Routledge.

Ballet, K., & Kelchtermans, G. (2009). Struggling with workload: Primary teachers’ experience of intensification. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(8), 1150–1157.

Buckingham Shum, S., Ferguson, R., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2019). Human-centred learning analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(2), 1–9.

Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281.

de Jager, B., Jansen, M., & Reezigt, G. (2005). The development of metacognition in primary school learning environments. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16(2), 179–196.

Elo, A. (1978). The rating of chess players, past and present. New York: Arco.

Gillies, R. M., Ashman, A., & Terwel, J. (Eds.) (2008). The teacher’s role in implementing cooperative learning in the classroom. New York: Springer.

Gudmundsdottir, S., & Shulman, L. (1987). Pedagogical content knowledge in social studies. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 31(2), 59–70.

Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Abingdon-on-Thames, UK: Routledge.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.

Herodotou, C., Rienties, B., Boroowa, A., Zdrahal, Z., & Hlosta, M. (2019). A large-scale implementation of predictive learning analytics in higher education: The teachers’ role and perspective. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(5), 1273–1306.

Hutchins, E. (2000). Distributed cognition. In International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science.

Kaiser, J., Südkamp, A., & Möller, J. (2017). The effects of student characteristics on teachers’ judgment accuracy: Disentangling ethnicity, minority status, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(6), 871–888.

Keuvelaar-van den Bergh, L. (2013). Teacher feedback during active learning: The development and evaluation of a professional development programme.

Knoop-van Campen, C. A. N, & Molenaar, I. (2020). How teachers integrate dashboards into their feedback practices. Frontline Learning Research, 8(4), 37–51.

Lin, T.-C., Tsai, C.-C., Chai, C. S., & Lee, M.-H. (2013). Identifying science teachers’ perceptions of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(3), 325–336.

Mandinach, E. B., & Gummer, E. S. (2016). What does it mean for teachers to be data literate: Laying out the skills, knowledge, and dispositions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 366–376.

MathTutor (2018).

Martinez-Maldonado, R., Clayphan, A., Yacef, K., & Kay, J. (2014). MTFeedback: Providing notifications to enhance teacher awareness of small group work in the classroom. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 8(2), 187–200.

Melero, J., Hernández-Leo, D., Sun, J., Santos, P., & Blat, J. (2015). How was the activity? A visualization support for a case of location-based learning design. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 317–329.

Molenaar, I., & Knoop-van Campen, C. A. N. (2017a). Teacher dashboards in practice: Usage and impact. Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL 2017), 12–15 September 2017, Tallinn, Estonia (pp. 125–138). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Cham.

Molenaar, I., & Knoop-van Campen, C. A. N. (2017b). How teachers differ in using dashboards: The classroom observation app. Paper presented at the Multimodal Learning Analytics Across (Physical and Digital) Spaces workshop at the 12th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL 2017), 12–15 September 2017, Tallinn, Estonia.

Molenaar, I., & Knoop-van Campen, C. (2019). How teachers make dashboard information actionable. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 12(3), 347–355.

Mueller, J., Wood, E., Willoughby, T., Ross, C., & Specht, J. (2008). Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration. Computers and Education, 51(4), 1523–1537.

Rienties, B., Herodotou, C., Olney, T., Schencks, M., & Boroowa, A. (2018). Making sense of learning analytics dashboards: A technology acceptance perspective of 95 teachers. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(5).

Roelofs, E., & Sanders, P. (2007). Towards a framework for assessing teacher competence. European Journal of Vocational Training, 40(1), 123–139.

Schwarz, B. B., & Asterhan, C. S. (2011). E-moderation of synchronous discussions in educational settings: A nascent practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(3), 395–442.

Schwendimann, B., Rodriguez-Triana, M., Vozniuk, A., Prieto, L., Boroujeni, M., Holzer, A., … Dillenbourg, P. (2017). Perceiving learning at a glance: A systematic literature review of learning dashboard research. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 10(1), 30–41.

Sergis, S., & Sampson, D. G. (2017). Teaching and learning analytics to support teacher inquiry: A systematic literature review. In A. Peña-Ayala (Ed.), Learning Analytics: Fundaments, Applications, and Trends (pp. 25–63). Springer.

Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189.

Siemens, G., & Gašević, D. (2012). Guest editorial: Learning and knowledge analytics. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 1–2.

Teo, T. (2010). Measuring the effect of gender on computer attitudes among pre-service teachers: A multiple indicators, multiple causes (MIMIC) modeling. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 27(4), 227–239.

Van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 571–596. Retrieved from

Van den Bergh, L., Ros, A., & Beijaard, D. (2013). Teacher feedback during active learning: Current practices in primary schools. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 341–362.

Van Den Bosch, R. M., Espin, C. A., Chung, S., & Saab, N. (2017). Data‐based decision‐making: Teachers’ comprehension of curriculum‐based measurement progress‐monitoring graphs. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 32(1), 46–60.

Van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., Erkens, G., & Brekelmans, M. (2014). Supporting teachers in guiding collaborating students: Effects of learning analytics in CSCL. Computers & Education, 79, 28–39.

Van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., Erkens, G., & Brekelmans, M. (2015). Teacher regulation of cognitive activities during student collaboration: Effects of learning analytics. Computers & Education, 90, 80–94.

Van Leeuwen, A., & Janssen, J. (2019). A systematic review of teacher guidance during collaborative learning in primary and secondary education. Educational Research Review, 27, 71–89.

Van Leeuwen, A., Rummel, N., & van Gog, T. (2019). What information should CSCL teacher dashboards provide to help teachers interpret CSCL situations? International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14, 261–289.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.

Verbert, K., Govaerts, S., Duval, E., Santos, J. L., Van Assche, F., Parra, G., & Klerkx, J. (2014). Learning dashboards: An overview and future research opportunities. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(6), 1499–1514.

Verloop, N., Van Driel, J., & Meijer, P. (2001). Teacher knowledge and the knowledge base of teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 441–461.–4

Wise, A. F., & Jung, Y. (2019). Teaching with analytics: Towards a situated model of instructional decision-making. Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(2).

Wong, K.-T., Teo, T., & Russo, S. (2012). Influence of gender and computer teaching efficacy on computer acceptance among Malaysian student teachers: An extended technology acceptance model. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(7), 1190–1207.

Xhakaj, F., Aleven, V., & McLaren, B. M. (2017). Effects of a teacher dashboard for an intelligent tutoring system on teacher knowledge, lesson planning, lessons and student learning. Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL 2017), 12–15 September 2017, Tallinn, Estonia (pp. 315–329). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Cham.




How to Cite

van Leeuwen, A., Knoop-van Campen, C. A. N., Molenaar, I., & Rummel, N. (2021). How Teacher Characteristics Relate to How Teachers Use Dashboards: Results From Two Case Studies in K-12. Journal of Learning Analytics, 8(2), 6-21.



Special Section: Learning Analytics for Primary and Secondary Schools

Most read articles by the same author(s)