The Coming but Uneven Storm
How AI Regulation Will Impact AI and Learning Analytics Research in Different Countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2025.8495Keywords:
AI regulations, AI policy, learning analytics, OECD, AI framework, research paperAbstract
This article investigates the state of AI regulations from diverse geopolitical contexts including the European Union, the United States, China, and several African nations, and their implications for learning analytics (LA) and AI research. We used a comparative analysis approach of 11 AI regulatory documents and applied the OECD framework to classify core priorities. The findings showed that the European Union and China have adopted the most comprehensive and strict AI regulations, potentially setting global standards once developed into legal instruments. In contrast, the United States has experienced a significant policy shift: the previously established AI Bill of Rights and Executive Order 14110 were revoked in early 2025 and replaced by a new Executive Order focused on economic competitiveness and deregulation. While the EU, UK, and China prioritize safety and avoiding algorithmic bias, Japan and some African countries emphasize AI systems’ economic and societal potential. Certain data types (e.g., Biometric sensors) might become challenging to use for education due to strict guidelines (particularly within the EU), necessitating careful consideration of data nature and privacy risks before use and when transferring data across jurisdictions. As regulations shift, researchers and practitioners must adapt to changing regulations across international boundaries, the legal benefits and risks of using open-source licenses, and regulatory sandboxes to minimize the risks for learners and developers and ensure ethical and legally compliant AI-driven LA systems.
References
Abramova, A., Ryzhkova, A., & Tserekh, I. (2022). AI ethics assessment at national and international levels: The approach to index framework and methodology (Research paper). MGIMO Centre for AI, Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4096669
Adeleke, F. A., & Akinwale, F. (2024). Responsible AI governance in Africa: Prospects for outcomes-based regulation. African Observatory on Responsible AI. https://idl-bnc-idrc.dspacedirect.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/67b0b63c-5d62-4309-979e-e3266a836136/content
Algorithmic Accountability Act of 2022, S. 3572, 117th Cong. (2022). https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/3572
Baker, R. S., & Hawn, A. (2022). Algorithmic bias in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(4), 1052–1092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00285-9
Baker, R. S. (2023). Getting past the current trade-off between privacy and equity in educational technology. In G. Brown III & C. A. Makridis (Eds.), The economics of equity in K–12 education: Connecting financial investments with effective programming (pp. 123–138). Rowman & Littlefield.
Baum, K., Bryson, J., Dignum, F., Dignum, V., Grobelnik, M., Hoos, H., Irgens, M., Lukowicz, P., Muller, C., Rossi, F., Shawe-Taylor, J., Theodorou, A., & Vinuesa, R. (2023). From fear to action: AI governance and opportunities for all. Frontiers in Computer Science, 5, Article 1210421. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2023.1210421
Bradford, A. (2020). The Brussels effect: How the European Union rules the world. Oxford University Press.
Buckingham Shum, S. (2023, June 19). Learning, analytics, AI, trust – and the future of universities. Universitas 21. https://universitas21.com/news/learning-analytics-ai-trust-and-future-universities/
Buckingham Shum, S., Ferguson, R., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2019). Human-centred learning analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.62.1
Bulathwela, S. M., Pérez-Ortiz, C., Holloway, J., & Shawe-Taylor, J. (2021). Could AI democratise education? Socio-technical imaginaries of an EdTech revolution. In P. Rodriguez Diaz, T. Afonja, K. Klemmer, A. Salama, N. Kalavakonda, O. Azeez, & S. Fobi (Eds.), Proceedings of the NeurIPS 2021 workshop on machine learning for the developing world: Global challenges. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.02034
Cabinet Secretariat, Government of Japan. (2019). Social principles of human-centric AI. https://www.cas.go.jp/jp/seisaku/jinkouchinou/pdf/humancentricai.pdf
Cachat-Rosset, G., & Klarsfeld, A. (2023). Diversity, equity and inclusion in artificial intelligence: An evaluation of guidelines. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 37(1), Article 2176618. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2023.2176618
Calvo, R. A., D’Mello, S., Gratch, J., & Kappas, A. (Eds.). (2015). The Oxford handbook of affective computing. Oxford University Press.
Colonna, L. (2022). The AI regulation and higher education: Preliminary observations and critical perspectives. In K. de Vries & M. Dahlberg (Eds.), Law, AI and Digitalisation (pp. 333–356). Iustus Förlag. https://doi.org/10.33063/dl.vi.428
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
Council of Europe. (2024). Framework convention on artificial intelligence and human rights, democracy and the rule of law (Council of Europe Treaty Series No. 225). https://rm.coe.int/1680afae3c
D’Mello, S., Lehman, B., Sullins, J., Daigle, R., Combs, R., Vogt, K., Perkins, L., & Graesser, A. (2010). A time for emoting: When affect sensitivity is and isn’t effective at promoting deep learning. In V. Aleven, J. Kay, & J. Mostow (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems: 10th international conference, ITS 2010, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, June 14–18, 2010, proceedings, part I (pp. 245–254). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13388-6_29
Datatilsynet. (2022). AVT: Exit report from the sandbox project with the Norwegian Association of Local and Regional Authorities (KS), the Centre for the Science of Learning & Technology (SLATE) at the University of Bergen (UiB), and the City of Oslo’s Education Agency. Norwegian Data Protection Authority. https://www.datatilsynet.no/en/regulations-and-tools/sandbox-for-artificial-intelligence/reports/avt--exit-report/
DeFalco, J. A., Rowe, J. P., Paquette, L., Georgoulas-Sherry, V., Brawner, K., Mott, B. W., Baker, R. S., & Lester, J. C. (2018). Detecting and addressing frustration in a serious game for military training. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 28(2), 152–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-017-0152-1
Digital Promise. (2022). Prioritizing racial equity certification. https://productcertifications.digitalpromise.org/certifications-by-our-partners/
Doroudi, S. (2023). The intertwined histories of artificial intelligence and education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 33(4), 885–928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-022-00313-2
Egypt Ministry of Communications and Information Technology. (2021). Egypt national artificial intelligence strategy. https://mcit.gov.eg/en/Publication/Publication_Summary/9283
European Parliament. (2021, April 19). Report on artificial intelligence in education, culture and the audiovisual sector (2020/2017(INI)) (Report No. A9-0127/2021). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2021-0127_EN.html#_section1
European Parliament. (2025a, February 2). EU AI Act: First regulation on artificial intelligence. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/society/20230601STO93804/eu-ai-act-first-regulation-on-artificial-intelligence
European Parliament. (2025b, June 3). AI act. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai
European Union. (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union, L119. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/2016-05-04
European Union. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union, L1689. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj
Federal Register. (2023). Executive Order 14110 of October 30, 2023: Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence. National Archives. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/11/01/2023-24283/safe-secure-and-trustworthy-development-and-use-of-artificial-intelligence
Florin, M.-V. (2022). Nine recommendations for the governance of AI systems. EPFL. https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/292403
Giegerich, T. (2023). How to regulate artificial intelligence: A screenshot of rapidly developing global, regional and European regulatory processes (Saar Expert Paper No. 09/2023). Europa Institut, Universität des Saarlandes. https://jean-monnet-saar.eu/?page_id=70
GPAI. (2022, November). Data justice policy brief: Putting data justice into practice. https://wp.oecd.ai/app/uploads/2025/05/data-justice-policy-brief-putting-data-justice-into-practice.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Government of Canada. (2022). Pan-Canadian artificial intelligence strategy. https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/ai-strategy/en
Google. (2021). Building a responsible regulatory framework for AI. https://web.archive.org/web/20241208052930/https://ai.google/static/documents/building-a-responsible-regulatory-framework-for-ai.pdf
Gupta, M., Akiri, C., Aryal, K., Parker, E., & Praharaj, L. (2023). From ChatGPT to threatGPT: Impact of generative AI in cybersecurity and privacy. IEEE Access, 11, pp. 80218–80245. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3300381
High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. (2019, April 8). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. Publications Office of the European Union. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. The Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Holmes, W., Persson, J., Chounta, I.-A., Wasson, B., & Dimitrova, V. (2022). Artificial intelligence and education: A critical view through the lens of human rights, democracy and the rule of law. Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/artificial-intelligence-and-education-a-critical-view-through-the-lens/1680a886bd
Holistic AI. (2025). State of AI regulations in 2025: Everything you need to know. https://www.holisticai.com/papers/state-of-ai-regulations-ebook
Hutt, S., Das, S., & Baker, R. S. (2023). The Right to Be Forgotten and Educational Data Mining: Challenges and Paths Forward. International Educational Data Mining Society. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED630886.pdf
Holstein, K., Wortman Vaughan, J., Daumé, H., III., Dudik, M., & Wallach, H. (2019). Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need? In S. Brewster, G. Fitzpatrick, A. Cox, & V. Kostakos (Eds.), CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (Article 600). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300830
Cyberspace Administration of China. (2022, November 25). Provisions on the Administration of Deep Synthesis in Internet Based Information Services. [Hùliánwǎng Xìnxī Fúwù Shēndù Héchéng Guǎnlǐ Guīdìng]. Ministry of Industry and Information Technology; Ministry of Public Security. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2022-12/12/content_5731431.htm
Hutson, M. (2023). Rules to keep AI in check: Nations carve different paths for tech regulation. Nature, 620, 260–263. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-02491-y
Huang, K., Joshi, A., Dun, S., & Hamilton, N. (2024). AI regulations. In K. Huang, Y. Wang, B. Goertzel, Y. Li, S. Wright, & J. Ponnapalli (Eds.), Generative AI security: Theories and practices (pp. 61–98). Springer Nature Switzerland.
IEEE. (2019). Ethically aligned design: A vision for prioritizing human well-being with autonomous and intelligent systems. https://standards.ieee.org/wp-content/uploads/import/documents/other/ead1e.pdf
IEEE. (2020). IEEE recommended practice for assessing the impact of autonomous and intelligent systems on human well-being (IEEE Std 7010-2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2020.9084219.
Irwin, S. (2013). Qualitative secondary data analysis: Ethics, epistemology, and context. Progress in Development Studies, 13(4), 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464993413490479
Kunnskapsdepartementet. (2023). Læring, hvor ble det av deg i alt mylderet? Bruk av elev- og studentdata for å fremme læring [Learning, where did you end up in all the chaos? Using student data to promote learning] (NOU 2023:19). Departementenes sikkerhets-og serviceorganisasjon. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/nou-2023-19/id2982722/
Koop, C., & Lodge, M. (2017). What is regulation? An interdisciplinary concept analysis. Regulation & Governance, 11(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12094
Li, S., & Gu, X. (2023). A risk framework for human-centered artificial intelligence in education. Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 187–202. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48707976
Miao, F., Holmes, W., Huang, R., & Zhang, H. (2021). AI and education: Guidance for policy-makers. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/PCSP7350
Madaio, M., Blodgett, S. L., Mayfield, E., & Dixon-Román, E. (2023). Beyond “fairness”: Structural (in)justice lenses on AI for education. In W. Holmes & K. Porayska-Pomsta (Eds.), The ethics of artificial intelligence in education: Practices, challenges, and debates (pp. 203–239). Routledge.
Meskó, B., & Topol, E. J. (2023). The imperative for regulatory oversight of large language models (or generative AI) in healthcare. NPJ Digital Medicine, 6(1), Article 120. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00873-0
Mökander, J., Sheth, M., Watson, D. S., & Floridi, L. (2023). The switch, the ladder, and the matrix: Models for classifying AI systems. Minds and Machines, 33(1), 221–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-022-09620-y
Morrow, V., Boddy, J., & Lamb, R. (2014). The ethics of secondary data analysis: Learning from the experience of sharing qualitative data from young people and their families in an international study of childhood poverty (NOVELLA Working Paper). National Centre for Research Methods, NOVELLA. https://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/id/eprint/3301/
Munn, L. (2023). The uselessness of AI ethics. AI and Ethics, 3(3), 869–877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00209-w
National Program for Artificial Intelligence. (2018). UAE national strategy for artificial intelligence 2031. Government of the United Arab Emirates. https://ai.gov.ae/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/UAE-National-Strategy-for-Artificial-Intelligence-2031.pdf
National Technical Committee 260 on Cybersecurity of Standardization Administration of China. (2024, February 29). Shēngchéng shì réngōng zhìnéng fúwù ānquán jīběn yāoqiú (TC260-003) [Basic security requirements for generative artificial intelligence services] [National standard draft]. https://www.tc260.org.cn/upload/2024-03-01/1709282398070082466.pdf
Nemorin, S., Vlachidis, A., Ayerakwa, H. M., & Andriotis, P. (2023). AI hyped? A horizon scan of discourse on artificial intelligence in education (AIED) and development. Learning, Media and Technology, 48(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2022.2095568
Nguyen, A., Ngo, H. N., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Nguyen, B.-P. T. (2023). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 4221–4241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w
OECD. (2022). OECD framework for the classification of AI systems (OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 323). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/cb6d9eca-en
OECD. (n.d.). OECD.AI policy observatory. Retrieved June 21, 2025, from https://oecd.ai/en/
Oloruntade, G., & Omoniyi, F. (2023, May 26). Where is Africa in the global conversation on regulating AI? Techcabal. https://techcabal.com/2023/05/26/where-is-africa-in-the-global-conversation-on-regulating-ai/
Pasquale, F., & Selwyn, N. (2023). Education and the new laws of robotics. Postdigital Science and Education, 5(1), 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00325-0
Rauf, D. S. (2020, October 2). The new, tough expectations education companies face on race and diversity. EdWeek Market Brief. https://marketbrief.edweek.org/strategy-operations/the-new-tough-expectations-education-companies-face-on-race-and-diversity/2020/10
Republic of Rwanda, Ministry of ICT & Innovation. (2022). The national AI policy: To leverage AI to power economic growth, improve quality of life and position Rwanda as a global innovator for responsible and inclusive AI. https://www.minict.gov.rw/index.php?eID=dumpFile&t=f&f=67550&token=6195a53203e197efa47592f40ff4aaf24579640e
Sabourin, J., Kosturko, L., FitzGerald, C., & McQuiggan, S. (2015). Student privacy and educational data mining: Perspectives from industry. In O. C. Santos, J. G. Boticario, C. Romero, M. Pechenizkiy, A. Merceron, P. Mitros, J. M. Luna, C. Mihaescu, P. Moreno, A. Hershkovitz, S. Ventura, & M. Desmarais (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th international conference on educational data mining (pp. 164–170). International Educational Data Mining Society. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED560559.pdf
Sheehan, M. (2023, July). China’s AI regulations and how they get made (Working paper). Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Singh, O. P. (2023). Artificial intelligence in the era of ChatGPT: Opportunities and challenges in mental health care. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 65(3), 297–298. https://doi.org/10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_112_23
Slade, S., & Prinsloo, P. (2013). Learning analytics: Ethical issues and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1510–1529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479366
Sundar, S. S., Schmidt, C., & Villasenor, J. (2023, April 3). Audits, “soft laws,” and “automation bias”: 3 experts break down what it could take to regulate AI and how hard it will be. Fortune. https://fortune.com/2023/04/03/how-to-regulate-ai-challenges-three-experts/
TED. (2023, July 11). Will superintelligent AI end the world? [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yd0yQ9yxSYY
Tuomi, I., Cachia, R., & Villar-Onrubia, D. (2023). On the futures of technology in education: Emerging trends and policy implications. Publications Office of the European Union. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC134308
UNESCO. (2019). Beijing consensus on artificial intelligence and education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000368303
UNESCO. (2022). Landscape study of AI policies and use in Southern Africa: Research report. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000385563
United Kingdom Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport. (2022, July 18). Establishing a pro-innovation approach to regulating AI: An overview of the UK’s emerging approach (CP 728) [Policy paper]. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/establishing-a-pro-innovation-approach-to-regulating-ai
Veale, M., Matus, K., & Gorwa, R. (2023). AI and global governance: Modalities, rationales, tensions. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 19(1), 255–275. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-020223-040749
van der Maden, W., Lomas, D., Sadek, M., & Hekkert, P. (2024). Positive AI: Key challenges in designing artificial intelligence for wellbeing. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.12241
Wheeler, T. (2023, June 15). The three challenges of AI regulation. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-three-challenges-of-ai-regulation/
White House. (2025). Presidential actions: Executive order on removing barriers to American leadership in artificial intelligence. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/removing-barriers-to-american-leadership-in-artificial-intelligence/
Williamson, B. (2024). The social life of AI in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 34(1), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00342-5
Working Group on Artificial Intelligence. (2018, November). Mauritius artificial intelligence strategy: A report by the Working Group on Artificial Intelligence. Government of Mauritius. https://treasury.govmu.org/Documents/Strategies/Mauritius%20AI%20Strategy.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Learning Analytics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
